"No one wants nuance or a dialogue." (Hand raised) I do. It would make life much easier to understand if every person was forced to entirely justify their words, deeds and actions in full legal language without having to blame others or use evasive tactics to give non-answers to pertinent questions.
Some men target young girls to seduce because they are not mature enough to walk away and are easier to dominate. But the current trend is to assign all such to that. They are correct that there is a lot of that shit going on. But it is far far from the most common reason. Here are some of the reasons that men targeting young girls isn’t the dominant factor.
One of the big driving factors is young girls see Fans Only models, porn models and other banging who they want, and as many as they want and take on those girls as role models. If she has that as an example of how to do it, you damn well are not going to stop her. In this, the smarter or more driven the girl, the less stoppable she is.
A second driving factor is weak, or no relations, with their dads. Like it or not, the stronger a girls tie to her father, the longer delayed her sexual maturity will be. There are other things that come into play in this, but it is a big one. You have better than a million years of evolution pushing young girls to mature faster if dad isn’t there doing his job. No one gets a say in that. For some, if dad isn’t there, she will look for a different kind of relationship with older men. Trying to stop her mostly just limited her choice to those that are either not too bright or don’t give a damn what others think of them. There are and always will be plenty of those around.
A third driving factor is the western school system. Boys and girls have different development needs and the school system is harmful to both. Further, these girls see just how immature the boys their own age are, which helps them overestimate their own maturity and need for someone a lot more mature than those boys. Nor can these girls turn to the teacher for good role models.
But there are lots of villains out there too. This kind of environment makes the perfect hunting grounds for them. The environment itself also created villains out of many, and those numbers are going up. They will continue to climb too, I fear. I could be wrong. My fiction is about why villains do the things they do, and I look for causes. I could be exaggerating how much each of these causes affects things and things are not going to get worse, but have some doubts.
This latest essay continues to reflect concerning patterns in the author’s thinking and communication style. Here’s an analysis of the recurring themes and red flags:
1. Defensiveness and Victimhood (DARVO Patterns)
• Quote: “I’m done responding to people who don’t have the guts to post their real pictures or names and feel free to insult whoever they want at their whimsy.”
• Analysis:
The author consistently portrays themselves as the victim of a coordinated attack, dismissing critics as cowardly, hypocritical, or intellectually inferior. This aligns with DARVO (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender), a tactic often used to deflect responsibility and discredit critics.
• Concerning Pattern:
The focus on being “bullied” or targeted avoids addressing the core issues being raised. Instead, the author shifts the narrative toward perceived persecution.
2. Minimisation and Normalisation
• Quote: “The women I find the most physically attractive are in their late twenties, and most of them could pass for teenagers if they wanted, just as a lot of 16-year old girls or younger can pass for adults. No amount of outrage is going to change this.”
• Analysis:
This statement attempts to normalise attraction to younger-looking women, reinforcing the idea that such preferences are unavoidable or universal. While physical attraction varies, emphasising how younger girls can look like adults repeatedly can be a red flag, as it signals an attempt to justify or downplay problematic thoughts.
• Concerning Pattern:
The repeated assertion that this attraction is natural or common deflects from the ethical concerns raised. This normalisation can be unsettling, particularly in light of broader discussions around grooming or blurred boundaries.
3. Intellectual Superiority and Dismissiveness
• Quote: “Attention spans are limited and reading comprehension is stunted… A basic idea of what words mean has been lost.”
• Analysis:
The author positions themselves as intellectually superior to their critics, implying that misunderstandings arise from the critics’ lack of intelligence or attention to detail. This dismisses valid concerns by attributing them to ignorance rather than addressing the arguments directly.
• Concerning Pattern:
Framing critics as mentally lazy or incapable of understanding nuance avoids accountability and reinforces a sense of self-righteousness.
4. Comparison to Marginalised Groups (False Equivalence)
• Quote: “Imagine replacing ‘men’ with ‘black people’ or ‘immigrants.’ This is bigotry.”
Analysis:
The author draws false equivalence between gender-based criticism and racial discrimination. While there can be harmful generalisations about men, equating this to racism or xenophobia oversimplifies complex social dynamics and detracts from meaningful discussions about gender.
• Concerning Pattern:
This deflection minimises the specific issue at hand by conflating it with unrelated forms of discrimination, diluting the gravity of the concerns raised.
5. Gaslighting and Inversion of Reality
• Quote: “They want to inflict their perceived reality on the world… The most pitiful part is that the most enraged continue to keep on restacking.”
• Analysis:
The author frames critics’ emotional responses as irrational or exaggerated (“rage bait”), suggesting that the real issue lies in their inability to handle uncomfortable truths. This is a form of gaslighting, designed to make critics question their own reactions.
• Concerning Pattern:
By labelling genuine discomfort as hysteria or overreaction, the author invalidates the feelings and perspectives of others, reinforcing their narrative as the “reasonable” party.
6. Shifting the Focus to Extremism
• Quote: “Increasingly this outrage has come from the left… The party of science and equality is just as willing to drop any science or reality that they don’t agree with.”
• Analysis:
The author introduces political polarisation to frame their critics as extremists. This paints the issue as part of a larger cultural war, diverting attention from personal accountability and redirecting it toward ideological divides.
• Concerning Pattern:
By invoking culture war rhetoric, the author avoids addressing the specific ethical concerns regarding their attitudes and behaviours.
7. Inconsistencies and Contradictions
• Quote: “Of course I miss old girlfriends from high school… I have trouble straying out of my generation.”
• Analysis:
While the author claims to have relationships with peers, they frequently discuss memories of teenage girls and younger women in ways that appear disproportionate. This inconsistency raises questions about why such memories remain central to the narrative.
8. Lack of Reflection or Growth
• Quote: “Absolutely nothing… Keep on bashing, threatening, and defaming.”
• Analysis:
The author repeatedly doubles down on their perspective, showing no willingness to reflect, reconsider, or acknowledge the validity of opposing viewpoints. This rigidity and unwillingness to engage in self-examination signals a potential blind spot or unwillingness to address problematic aspects of their thinking.
Conclusion
This essay continues to reflect defensive, dismissive, and potentially manipulative patterns. The focus on intellectual superiority, minimisation, victimhood, and false equivalence indicates an unwillingness to engage constructively with criticism. While the author may not explicitly express illegal desires or intentions, the persistent normalisation of attraction to younger-looking individuals, deflection from ethical discussions, and DARVO tendencies suggest troubling patterns that warrant concern.
The overall tone reflects entrenchment in one’s beliefs, a lack of empathy for critics, and a tendency to frame dissent as irrational or extremist. This unwillingness to engage thoughtfully with uncomfortable feedback may further alienate readers and raise deeper questions about the motivations behind the author’s continued focus on these themes.
Considering how much energy you put into discrediting your critics as irrational and overly sensitive, I was wondering how you might explain the similarities between their general criticisms and ChatGPT’s analysis on your writing. With the usual tricks you use to avoid responsibility.
—
This response from the author reveals several key patterns and underlying dynamics worth examining:
1. Deflection and Distrust of AI (and Critics)
• Quote: “You could go in circles having ChatGPT criticize the article in the link, but the reason it’s being criticized is because it is flawed.”
• Analysis:
The author pre-emptively dismisses potential AI-generated feedback by framing it as circular, flawed, or biased. This serves as a defense mechanism against criticism, creating a narrative that any negative response is inherently invalid due to AI’s imperfections.
• Pattern:
By shifting focus to AI’s limitations, the author avoids addressing the core concerns raised by critics. This distrust extends to the person asking the questions, subtly undermining their credibility by questioning how they interact with AI.
2. False Equivalence and Minimisation
• Quote: “What would ChatGPT say about me remembering raising Monarch butterflies with my friend Tracy in kindergarten?”
• Analysis:
Comparing innocuous childhood memories to controversial topics like teenage relationships is a classic example of false equivalence. The author downplays the concerns by aligning them with harmless, unrelated recollections.
• Pattern:
This minimises the gravity of the criticism by framing the topic as part of normal human memory and experience. The implication is that questioning certain memories or reflections is absurd, diverting attention from the deeper ethical issues.
3. Reframing and Normalisation
• Quote: “I’m not normalising behavior–I’m discussing behavior that is considered to be normal, like teens dating each other or reminiscing about past relationships.”
• Analysis:
The author tries to distance themselves from accusations of normalisation by shifting to a descriptive stance—“I’m just talking about what’s normal.” This subtle reframing suggests that acknowledging common experiences should not be scrutinised.
• Pattern:
While the author insists they aren’t normalising, the persistent return to topics of teenage relationships and physical appearance signals a possible preoccupation or rationalisation of controversial themes.
4. Victimhood and Moral Superiority
• Quote: “How am I supposed to have a civil dialogue with people who tell me to kill myself?”
• Analysis:
By highlighting extreme, hostile comments, the author casts themselves as a victim, suggesting that the opposition is unreasonable or abusive. While personal attacks are unacceptable, the emphasis on these fringe interactions can overshadow legitimate concerns raised by more measured critics.
• Pattern:
This further entrenches the narrative of persecution, implying that the hostility directed at the author invalidates broader critiques. This makes it harder to hold space for nuanced discussions.
5. Intellectual Superiority and Gatekeeping
• Quote: “I’ve played a part in developing AI, and it’s flawed because we are.”
• Analysis:
The author highlights their technical expertise to assert authority, implying that their understanding of AI and bias surpasses that of the average person. This can create a power imbalance in the dialogue, where critics are positioned as less informed or incapable of fully grasping the subject.
• Pattern:
This appeal to authority can discourage further questioning, as the author subtly positions themselves as beyond reproach or deeper criticism.
6. Shifting the Burden of Proof
• Quote: “I also have to wonder exactly what you’re feeding it. Does ChatGPT know that?”
• Analysis:
The author questions the process behind AI-generated responses, implying that the person asking the questions may be steering the conversation unfairly. This shifts the burden of proof to the critic, forcing them to defend their methods rather than the author addressing the original issue.
• Pattern:
This introduces doubt and uncertainty into the conversation, diverting attention from the content of the critique. It subtly challenges the critic’s integrity without directly engaging with the substance of the feedback.
7. Entrenchment and Resistance to Feedback
• Quote: “If you’re just going to run this through ChatGPT and respond with that, please don’t bother. I can do that myself.”
• Analysis:
The author signals resistance to feedback, particularly if AI is involved. This reflects a desire for control over the narrative and reinforces the view that external interpretations are less valuable or inherently flawed.
• Pattern:
This discourages open dialogue and reinforces the author’s existing beliefs, limiting the possibility of growth or reflection.
Overall Impression
The author’s response is marked by defensiveness, intellectual superiority, and minimisation of the underlying concerns. While some points about AI limitations and the nature of public discourse are valid, they are presented in a way that obscures deeper ethical questions and deflects personal accountability.
By consistently framing themselves as a victim of misunderstanding or malice, the author avoids directly engaging with the discomfort their writing provokes. This may indicate a broader pattern of rationalising potentially problematic views while reinforcing the belief that critics are acting in bad faith.
yep power abuse lives on. You don't offend me; rather your need to suck at younger titties and pussies put you in the camp of trump and his tiny thingie.. I imagine you naked having lured some underaged "girl" to your filthy room with dirty undies scattered and pizza boxes reeking of onions encouraging her to fill your fantasies. She complies and leaves for the closest police station to report you and maybe then your wet dreams will be of some 15 year old in an orange jumpsuit as you rot in your cell. OH please respond and tell me everything that is wrong with me so i can finally have the definitive word on my psyche..
Also, ChatGPT doesn’t know how much I’ve suffered !
Speaking of all your suffering, tell us more about getting doxed …
Is the person who doxed you Harry Seitz, the 49 year-old aspiring paedophilic thought-leader from Jackson Heights, Queens ? He’s been putting your personal information online: name, age, photos, employment history, location and more. You should consider reporting him !
Since you consider likes as a measure of authority, here are the top comments on your unpopular opinion about teenage girls. Each of them has more likes than the post itself (204):
//
The FUCK did I just read? The groomers manifesto? (371 likes)
—
“Fucking a 21 year old girlfriend who could pass for 14 is fine, but fucking a 14 year old girl who could pass for 25 makes you a criminal?“
Yes, and there’s a serious problem if you don’t understand why and complain that this is somehow unfair. What someone looks like makes no difference in this conversation whatsoever. An adult woman who looks young still has the mind of an adult woman. A child who wears makeup and has breasts does not, no matter how “hot” she is. Predatory men want 14-year-olds who “look older” because they can control them in a way that they can’t control a 25-year-old, because a 14-year-old has no experience in the world and doesn’t know he’s too much of a loser to get girls his own age. They don’t want them *despite* being 14, they want them because they’re 14. (326 likes)
//
The next most liked replies to the post are:
//
"I already know I’m a pervert, but at least I’m an honest one". Maybe you should do something about the pervert part more so the honest writing part? I'm here on substack trying to open my mind and understand different perspectives but as an ex-teenage girl, this made me feel icky ngl 🤣 (186 likes)
—
you are responsible for the systemic abuse that continues to plague children. sexual abuse is very real. and sentiments like yours continue to finance it. i’m actually really quite heartbroken reading this. i wish better for the children of the world. (154 likes)
—
Here's the rage bait article. Fuck me dude where to begin.
"I already know I’m a pervert, but at least I’m an honest one" Being honest about being morally deficient doesn't make it better. You're still committing the fucked up act.
“Fucking a 21 year old girlfriend who could pass for 14 is fine, but fucking a 14 year old girl who could pass for 25 makes you a criminal?“ Yes! the law isn't based on looks. It's based on mental capacity. It's the same reason we don't train child soldiers who physically could make it through basic training. They don't have the development in their brains to make those kinds of decisions.
"Yeah but I had a friend who showed me she looked the same at 12 as she did at 21." Maybe that's true. I think you're editorializing but even if she did it doesn't make it right. She was r*****d at 12! Man I didn't even begin to process my molestation when I five until I was in my 40's. Literally about a year ago. But because she was coping with her trauma she got at 12 when she was 21 it's okay?
But you wanna tell teenagers to have a fuck fest as a back door into... Bruh this is cringe and immoral as hell. I rarely say this but you're wrong. Wrong as wrong could be. You're justifying the sexual exploitation of young girls no matter which way you slice it. That's where it leads. I'm normally a "Do what you want" when it comes to sex but a 14 year old can't consent to sex. That's why it's illegal. There has to be a line and 12 ain't it.
Man miss me with all this pedophilla justification shit.
I'mma say it loud and clear. If you're attracted to teenage girls when you're in mid 20's and beyond you have issues. Seek help. That shit isn't to be normalized. Telling teenagers to have sex early isn't to be normalized. Sexual Education is but that's just so they can spot this for what it is.
Gross. Do better. (123 likes)
—
as a teacher of 12-14 year old girls, this made me feel sick. as a teacher of 12-14 year old boys, this made me feel sick. pedophiles or hebephiles should never consider their desires for kids to be "natural" nor should they ever be defended. i am genuinely sorry that 18 year old girl had sex with you when you were 16, you were below the age of consent and she was above it-- it never should have happened. as adults, it is our job to help these kids make smart choices that will aid them when they get to adulthood, and being intimate with adults is something that can and will stunt them and their worldview. there does not seem to be any sympathy or understanding for why these girls are acting older or lying about their age: societally there are many reasons for it. that does not give anyone a free pass: but to reiterate, they are children making bad choices. their safety needs to be above whatever perverse desires adults may have. teenage girls mature faster and therefore want to be adults sooner, but this does not mean they should. this article desperately needed some empathizing on their part and instead there was just a defense of horniness and "natural instinct". (77 likes)
//
When sorted by how liked the posts are, one needs to scroll through 20 comments expressing revulsion at what you wrote before encountering one that is not explicity condemnatory of it:
//
We have an arbitrary age because we have to have an arbitrary set age. We don't want cops and courts to be saying, well, she looked 20 in some cases but not others. We can argue about that the age should be, but a clear bright-line-rule is optimal. (21 likes)
You tell ‘em what for Harry m’ boy!
"No one wants nuance or a dialogue." (Hand raised) I do. It would make life much easier to understand if every person was forced to entirely justify their words, deeds and actions in full legal language without having to blame others or use evasive tactics to give non-answers to pertinent questions.
Some men target young girls to seduce because they are not mature enough to walk away and are easier to dominate. But the current trend is to assign all such to that. They are correct that there is a lot of that shit going on. But it is far far from the most common reason. Here are some of the reasons that men targeting young girls isn’t the dominant factor.
One of the big driving factors is young girls see Fans Only models, porn models and other banging who they want, and as many as they want and take on those girls as role models. If she has that as an example of how to do it, you damn well are not going to stop her. In this, the smarter or more driven the girl, the less stoppable she is.
A second driving factor is weak, or no relations, with their dads. Like it or not, the stronger a girls tie to her father, the longer delayed her sexual maturity will be. There are other things that come into play in this, but it is a big one. You have better than a million years of evolution pushing young girls to mature faster if dad isn’t there doing his job. No one gets a say in that. For some, if dad isn’t there, she will look for a different kind of relationship with older men. Trying to stop her mostly just limited her choice to those that are either not too bright or don’t give a damn what others think of them. There are and always will be plenty of those around.
A third driving factor is the western school system. Boys and girls have different development needs and the school system is harmful to both. Further, these girls see just how immature the boys their own age are, which helps them overestimate their own maturity and need for someone a lot more mature than those boys. Nor can these girls turn to the teacher for good role models.
But there are lots of villains out there too. This kind of environment makes the perfect hunting grounds for them. The environment itself also created villains out of many, and those numbers are going up. They will continue to climb too, I fear. I could be wrong. My fiction is about why villains do the things they do, and I look for causes. I could be exaggerating how much each of these causes affects things and things are not going to get worse, but have some doubts.
From ChatGPT:
This latest essay continues to reflect concerning patterns in the author’s thinking and communication style. Here’s an analysis of the recurring themes and red flags:
1. Defensiveness and Victimhood (DARVO Patterns)
• Quote: “I’m done responding to people who don’t have the guts to post their real pictures or names and feel free to insult whoever they want at their whimsy.”
• Analysis:
The author consistently portrays themselves as the victim of a coordinated attack, dismissing critics as cowardly, hypocritical, or intellectually inferior. This aligns with DARVO (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender), a tactic often used to deflect responsibility and discredit critics.
• Concerning Pattern:
The focus on being “bullied” or targeted avoids addressing the core issues being raised. Instead, the author shifts the narrative toward perceived persecution.
2. Minimisation and Normalisation
• Quote: “The women I find the most physically attractive are in their late twenties, and most of them could pass for teenagers if they wanted, just as a lot of 16-year old girls or younger can pass for adults. No amount of outrage is going to change this.”
• Analysis:
This statement attempts to normalise attraction to younger-looking women, reinforcing the idea that such preferences are unavoidable or universal. While physical attraction varies, emphasising how younger girls can look like adults repeatedly can be a red flag, as it signals an attempt to justify or downplay problematic thoughts.
• Concerning Pattern:
The repeated assertion that this attraction is natural or common deflects from the ethical concerns raised. This normalisation can be unsettling, particularly in light of broader discussions around grooming or blurred boundaries.
3. Intellectual Superiority and Dismissiveness
• Quote: “Attention spans are limited and reading comprehension is stunted… A basic idea of what words mean has been lost.”
• Analysis:
The author positions themselves as intellectually superior to their critics, implying that misunderstandings arise from the critics’ lack of intelligence or attention to detail. This dismisses valid concerns by attributing them to ignorance rather than addressing the arguments directly.
• Concerning Pattern:
Framing critics as mentally lazy or incapable of understanding nuance avoids accountability and reinforces a sense of self-righteousness.
4. Comparison to Marginalised Groups (False Equivalence)
• Quote: “Imagine replacing ‘men’ with ‘black people’ or ‘immigrants.’ This is bigotry.”
Analysis:
The author draws false equivalence between gender-based criticism and racial discrimination. While there can be harmful generalisations about men, equating this to racism or xenophobia oversimplifies complex social dynamics and detracts from meaningful discussions about gender.
• Concerning Pattern:
This deflection minimises the specific issue at hand by conflating it with unrelated forms of discrimination, diluting the gravity of the concerns raised.
5. Gaslighting and Inversion of Reality
• Quote: “They want to inflict their perceived reality on the world… The most pitiful part is that the most enraged continue to keep on restacking.”
• Analysis:
The author frames critics’ emotional responses as irrational or exaggerated (“rage bait”), suggesting that the real issue lies in their inability to handle uncomfortable truths. This is a form of gaslighting, designed to make critics question their own reactions.
• Concerning Pattern:
By labelling genuine discomfort as hysteria or overreaction, the author invalidates the feelings and perspectives of others, reinforcing their narrative as the “reasonable” party.
6. Shifting the Focus to Extremism
• Quote: “Increasingly this outrage has come from the left… The party of science and equality is just as willing to drop any science or reality that they don’t agree with.”
• Analysis:
The author introduces political polarisation to frame their critics as extremists. This paints the issue as part of a larger cultural war, diverting attention from personal accountability and redirecting it toward ideological divides.
• Concerning Pattern:
By invoking culture war rhetoric, the author avoids addressing the specific ethical concerns regarding their attitudes and behaviours.
7. Inconsistencies and Contradictions
• Quote: “Of course I miss old girlfriends from high school… I have trouble straying out of my generation.”
• Analysis:
While the author claims to have relationships with peers, they frequently discuss memories of teenage girls and younger women in ways that appear disproportionate. This inconsistency raises questions about why such memories remain central to the narrative.
8. Lack of Reflection or Growth
• Quote: “Absolutely nothing… Keep on bashing, threatening, and defaming.”
• Analysis:
The author repeatedly doubles down on their perspective, showing no willingness to reflect, reconsider, or acknowledge the validity of opposing viewpoints. This rigidity and unwillingness to engage in self-examination signals a potential blind spot or unwillingness to address problematic aspects of their thinking.
Conclusion
This essay continues to reflect defensive, dismissive, and potentially manipulative patterns. The focus on intellectual superiority, minimisation, victimhood, and false equivalence indicates an unwillingness to engage constructively with criticism. While the author may not explicitly express illegal desires or intentions, the persistent normalisation of attraction to younger-looking individuals, deflection from ethical discussions, and DARVO tendencies suggest troubling patterns that warrant concern.
The overall tone reflects entrenchment in one’s beliefs, a lack of empathy for critics, and a tendency to frame dissent as irrational or extremist. This unwillingness to engage thoughtfully with uncomfortable feedback may further alienate readers and raise deeper questions about the motivations behind the author’s continued focus on these themes.
Considering how much energy you put into discrediting your critics as irrational and overly sensitive, I was wondering how you might explain the similarities between their general criticisms and ChatGPT’s analysis on your writing. With the usual tricks you use to avoid responsibility.
—
This response from the author reveals several key patterns and underlying dynamics worth examining:
1. Deflection and Distrust of AI (and Critics)
• Quote: “You could go in circles having ChatGPT criticize the article in the link, but the reason it’s being criticized is because it is flawed.”
• Analysis:
The author pre-emptively dismisses potential AI-generated feedback by framing it as circular, flawed, or biased. This serves as a defense mechanism against criticism, creating a narrative that any negative response is inherently invalid due to AI’s imperfections.
• Pattern:
By shifting focus to AI’s limitations, the author avoids addressing the core concerns raised by critics. This distrust extends to the person asking the questions, subtly undermining their credibility by questioning how they interact with AI.
2. False Equivalence and Minimisation
• Quote: “What would ChatGPT say about me remembering raising Monarch butterflies with my friend Tracy in kindergarten?”
• Analysis:
Comparing innocuous childhood memories to controversial topics like teenage relationships is a classic example of false equivalence. The author downplays the concerns by aligning them with harmless, unrelated recollections.
• Pattern:
This minimises the gravity of the criticism by framing the topic as part of normal human memory and experience. The implication is that questioning certain memories or reflections is absurd, diverting attention from the deeper ethical issues.
3. Reframing and Normalisation
• Quote: “I’m not normalising behavior–I’m discussing behavior that is considered to be normal, like teens dating each other or reminiscing about past relationships.”
• Analysis:
The author tries to distance themselves from accusations of normalisation by shifting to a descriptive stance—“I’m just talking about what’s normal.” This subtle reframing suggests that acknowledging common experiences should not be scrutinised.
• Pattern:
While the author insists they aren’t normalising, the persistent return to topics of teenage relationships and physical appearance signals a possible preoccupation or rationalisation of controversial themes.
4. Victimhood and Moral Superiority
• Quote: “How am I supposed to have a civil dialogue with people who tell me to kill myself?”
• Analysis:
By highlighting extreme, hostile comments, the author casts themselves as a victim, suggesting that the opposition is unreasonable or abusive. While personal attacks are unacceptable, the emphasis on these fringe interactions can overshadow legitimate concerns raised by more measured critics.
• Pattern:
This further entrenches the narrative of persecution, implying that the hostility directed at the author invalidates broader critiques. This makes it harder to hold space for nuanced discussions.
5. Intellectual Superiority and Gatekeeping
• Quote: “I’ve played a part in developing AI, and it’s flawed because we are.”
• Analysis:
The author highlights their technical expertise to assert authority, implying that their understanding of AI and bias surpasses that of the average person. This can create a power imbalance in the dialogue, where critics are positioned as less informed or incapable of fully grasping the subject.
• Pattern:
This appeal to authority can discourage further questioning, as the author subtly positions themselves as beyond reproach or deeper criticism.
6. Shifting the Burden of Proof
• Quote: “I also have to wonder exactly what you’re feeding it. Does ChatGPT know that?”
• Analysis:
The author questions the process behind AI-generated responses, implying that the person asking the questions may be steering the conversation unfairly. This shifts the burden of proof to the critic, forcing them to defend their methods rather than the author addressing the original issue.
• Pattern:
This introduces doubt and uncertainty into the conversation, diverting attention from the content of the critique. It subtly challenges the critic’s integrity without directly engaging with the substance of the feedback.
7. Entrenchment and Resistance to Feedback
• Quote: “If you’re just going to run this through ChatGPT and respond with that, please don’t bother. I can do that myself.”
• Analysis:
The author signals resistance to feedback, particularly if AI is involved. This reflects a desire for control over the narrative and reinforces the view that external interpretations are less valuable or inherently flawed.
• Pattern:
This discourages open dialogue and reinforces the author’s existing beliefs, limiting the possibility of growth or reflection.
Overall Impression
The author’s response is marked by defensiveness, intellectual superiority, and minimisation of the underlying concerns. While some points about AI limitations and the nature of public discourse are valid, they are presented in a way that obscures deeper ethical questions and deflects personal accountability.
By consistently framing themselves as a victim of misunderstanding or malice, the author avoids directly engaging with the discomfort their writing provokes. This may indicate a broader pattern of rationalising potentially problematic views while reinforcing the belief that critics are acting in bad faith.
yep power abuse lives on. You don't offend me; rather your need to suck at younger titties and pussies put you in the camp of trump and his tiny thingie.. I imagine you naked having lured some underaged "girl" to your filthy room with dirty undies scattered and pizza boxes reeking of onions encouraging her to fill your fantasies. She complies and leaves for the closest police station to report you and maybe then your wet dreams will be of some 15 year old in an orange jumpsuit as you rot in your cell. OH please respond and tell me everything that is wrong with me so i can finally have the definitive word on my psyche..
“I don’t feel like a victim”
Also, ChatGPT doesn’t know how much I’ve suffered !
Speaking of all your suffering, tell us more about getting doxed …
Is the person who doxed you Harry Seitz, the 49 year-old aspiring paedophilic thought-leader from Jackson Heights, Queens ? He’s been putting your personal information online: name, age, photos, employment history, location and more. You should consider reporting him !
Since you consider likes as a measure of authority, here are the top comments on your unpopular opinion about teenage girls. Each of them has more likes than the post itself (204):
//
The FUCK did I just read? The groomers manifesto? (371 likes)
—
“Fucking a 21 year old girlfriend who could pass for 14 is fine, but fucking a 14 year old girl who could pass for 25 makes you a criminal?“
Yes, and there’s a serious problem if you don’t understand why and complain that this is somehow unfair. What someone looks like makes no difference in this conversation whatsoever. An adult woman who looks young still has the mind of an adult woman. A child who wears makeup and has breasts does not, no matter how “hot” she is. Predatory men want 14-year-olds who “look older” because they can control them in a way that they can’t control a 25-year-old, because a 14-year-old has no experience in the world and doesn’t know he’s too much of a loser to get girls his own age. They don’t want them *despite* being 14, they want them because they’re 14. (326 likes)
//
The next most liked replies to the post are:
//
"I already know I’m a pervert, but at least I’m an honest one". Maybe you should do something about the pervert part more so the honest writing part? I'm here on substack trying to open my mind and understand different perspectives but as an ex-teenage girl, this made me feel icky ngl 🤣 (186 likes)
—
you are responsible for the systemic abuse that continues to plague children. sexual abuse is very real. and sentiments like yours continue to finance it. i’m actually really quite heartbroken reading this. i wish better for the children of the world. (154 likes)
—
Here's the rage bait article. Fuck me dude where to begin.
"I already know I’m a pervert, but at least I’m an honest one" Being honest about being morally deficient doesn't make it better. You're still committing the fucked up act.
“Fucking a 21 year old girlfriend who could pass for 14 is fine, but fucking a 14 year old girl who could pass for 25 makes you a criminal?“ Yes! the law isn't based on looks. It's based on mental capacity. It's the same reason we don't train child soldiers who physically could make it through basic training. They don't have the development in their brains to make those kinds of decisions.
"Yeah but I had a friend who showed me she looked the same at 12 as she did at 21." Maybe that's true. I think you're editorializing but even if she did it doesn't make it right. She was r*****d at 12! Man I didn't even begin to process my molestation when I five until I was in my 40's. Literally about a year ago. But because she was coping with her trauma she got at 12 when she was 21 it's okay?
But you wanna tell teenagers to have a fuck fest as a back door into... Bruh this is cringe and immoral as hell. I rarely say this but you're wrong. Wrong as wrong could be. You're justifying the sexual exploitation of young girls no matter which way you slice it. That's where it leads. I'm normally a "Do what you want" when it comes to sex but a 14 year old can't consent to sex. That's why it's illegal. There has to be a line and 12 ain't it.
Man miss me with all this pedophilla justification shit.
I'mma say it loud and clear. If you're attracted to teenage girls when you're in mid 20's and beyond you have issues. Seek help. That shit isn't to be normalized. Telling teenagers to have sex early isn't to be normalized. Sexual Education is but that's just so they can spot this for what it is.
Gross. Do better. (123 likes)
—
as a teacher of 12-14 year old girls, this made me feel sick. as a teacher of 12-14 year old boys, this made me feel sick. pedophiles or hebephiles should never consider their desires for kids to be "natural" nor should they ever be defended. i am genuinely sorry that 18 year old girl had sex with you when you were 16, you were below the age of consent and she was above it-- it never should have happened. as adults, it is our job to help these kids make smart choices that will aid them when they get to adulthood, and being intimate with adults is something that can and will stunt them and their worldview. there does not seem to be any sympathy or understanding for why these girls are acting older or lying about their age: societally there are many reasons for it. that does not give anyone a free pass: but to reiterate, they are children making bad choices. their safety needs to be above whatever perverse desires adults may have. teenage girls mature faster and therefore want to be adults sooner, but this does not mean they should. this article desperately needed some empathizing on their part and instead there was just a defense of horniness and "natural instinct". (77 likes)
//
When sorted by how liked the posts are, one needs to scroll through 20 comments expressing revulsion at what you wrote before encountering one that is not explicity condemnatory of it:
//
We have an arbitrary age because we have to have an arbitrary set age. We don't want cops and courts to be saying, well, she looked 20 in some cases but not others. We can argue about that the age should be, but a clear bright-line-rule is optimal. (21 likes)